OpenText Trading Grid vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to implement."

More OpenText Trading Grid Pros →

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters.""It is a scalable solution.""It is simple to transfer files.""The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.""t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The initial setup was straightforward."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"Technical support needs to be better."

More OpenText Trading Grid Cons →

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way.""The solution needs to move to the cloud.""We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters.""SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously.""The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to implement.
    Top Answer:The pricing is moderate. I'd rate the solution three out of five in terms of affordability.
    Top Answer:If you are on Trading Grid and you're trying to fetch the data, for example, the IDoc from SAP or the transfer data, sometimes there are system glitches wherein you will not be able to download the… more »
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    601
    Comparisons
    429
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    783
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,874
    Comparisons
    1,646
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
    Sample Customers
    Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Retailer9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 9th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator.

    See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.