Compare OpenText Web Site Management vs. Quintype

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
29th
Views
95
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
32nd
Views
62
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Web Site Management
Learn
OpenText
Quintype
Overview
OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.

Bold is the CMS that understands your content. Unlike a traditional CMS, Bold separates the presentation of the content from the content itself. This makes it effortless to create, curate and distribute content for modern consumption across different screens and screen-less voice devices. With a content workflow that is modeled after an effective newsroom, Bold makes it easy for authors to tell stories better with built-in support for reusable content cards, story elements, and story types.

All content added on Bold is optimized for distribution across channels such as SEO, Social and Mobile. Third-party integrations include Apple News, Google News, Facebook Instant Articles, AMP, PWA, Push notifications, email marketing, RSS feeds and others.

As a hosted SaaS CMS, Bold manages server management, performance, security and upgrades for its clients so that digital publishers can focus on creating great content for their audience.

Bold offers developers well-documented APIs, starter kits and design consulting services to jumpstart their own front-end development.

Bold offers free onboarding, migration services, 24/7 chat/email support, auto-scaling infrastructure, 95.95% uptime guarantee and regular backups.

Pricing for bold begins at $99/mo.

Offer
Learn more about OpenText Web Site Management
Learn more about Quintype
Sample Customers
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit DieselBloombergQuint, The Quint, National Herald, Samachara
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OpenText Web Site Management is ranked 29th in Web Content Management while Quintype is ranked 32nd in Web Content Management. OpenText Web Site Management is rated 0.0, while Quintype is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText Web Site Management is most compared with Sitecore Experience Manager, whereas Quintype is most compared with Wordpress.com VIP.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.