• Home
  • OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs. Sitecore Experience Manager

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs Sitecore Experience Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] and Sitecore Experience Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use OpenText Web Site Management [EOL]?
Anonymous User
It's a CMS with the usual features and functions. It was an old version and for us to move to a newer version we had to take three separate projects with each one incurring significant cost.
Ranking
Unranked
In Web Content Management
8th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
872
Comparisons
598
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Web Site Management
Sitecore XM
Learn More
OpenText
Sitecore
Overview
OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.

For those who want a robust CMS without all the digital marketing power of the Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), the Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) empowers you to deliver the right content, to the right person, exactly at the right time.

Sample Customers
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit Diesel
easyJet, Toshiba, Thomas Cook Travel Group, Oxfam, New York Life, Jabra, Graf von Faber-Castell, Canon, Boy Scouts of America
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization32%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise39%
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management while Sitecore Experience Manager is ranked 8th in Web Content Management. OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Sitecore Experience Manager is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sitecore Experience Manager writes "It's a CMS with the usual features and functions. It was an old version and for us to move to a newer version we had to take three separate projects with each one incurring significant cost". OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Sitecore Experience Manager is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, Magnolia CMS, Acquia Cloud Site Factory and CoreMedia.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.