• Home
  • OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs. XperienCentral

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs XperienCentral comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] and XperienCentral based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Web Content Management
42nd
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
32
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Web Site Management
Learn More
OpenText
GX Software
Video Not Available
Overview
OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.

The central go-to place where you manage every ‘experience’– that’s XperienCentral. With this powerful content management system (CMS) you personalize your digital channels and make them relevant and consistent. The system is rich in functionalities that make it simple to generate new and personalized content and publish it across different websites and channels.

Our CMS also guarantees that your websites are reliable and accessible and with its open architecture you can easily integrate existing content or other data already in the CSM. All this to help you to continuously create relevant content and engage in personalized dialogue with your customer.

Sample Customers
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit Diesel
ING Group, AFC Ajax, KPN, WWF, Nationale Postcode Loterij, Voetbal International
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management while XperienCentral is ranked 42nd in Web Content Management. OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while XperienCentral is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas XperienCentral is most compared with MULTIVERSA FIP Financial Integration Platform.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.