We performed a comparison between OpenVPN Access Server and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Highly configurable. You can create your own custom client installer and can rebrand the server-side program."
"It allows us to give access to our office network in a safe and secure way to users, no matter which computing platform they use. "
"The product’s adaptability is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of OpenVPN is that it is open source. I can do anything with the solution, such as change, build, and collect. Additionally, it is safe to use the solution and there are frequent updates."
"You can do local subnet blocking."
"Two-factor authentication allows us to not force frequent password changes."
"A valuable feature for us is its ability to see the new Citrix server as a local server within the company. And it allows us to test abroad."
"The most valuable thing about OpenVPN Access Server is its ease of use."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like to see a GUI or Web UI to manage users. Today these features are in the Pro Edition or are done by scripts."
"Open VPN Access Server could be more user-friendly."
"OpenVPN does not have the ability to selectively terminate connections."
"I'd like to have more control over the users when they are accessing the network."
"There could be an easier way to set up the solution. However, if you use the provided information that comes with the solution there should not be a problem."
"The logs should be made easier to read."
"They should make the solution more secure by adding some firewall functionalities."
"The stability of the OpenVPN Access Server has room for improvement."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 43 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.