We performed a comparison between OpsRamp and ServiceNow IT Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Event Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Predictive analysis is a valued feature."
"The most valuable features of OpsRamp include a single pane of glass, event correlation, personalized dashboards, and a single platform solution."
"Most features work fine."
"The technical support is fantastic, and they are fast to respond."
"The feature that we have found most useful are the dashboards, which can be built in minutes using this solution, allowing multiple products, thresholds, or any given required metric to be seen in a single area."
"We find the products seamless integration with Zendesk to be extremely valuable to our business."
"It greatly assists small and medium-sized businesses in using the ITSM, alerting, and monitoring features."
"The feature we found most valuable in OpsRamp is alert generation because whenever there is any kind of spike on any virtual machine, the solution generates alerts based on the thresholds we implemented. We have integrated our ideas and tools with OpsRamp, so alerts are generated, then we notify the customers. That's the main feature we like about OpsRamp because we don't have to monitor each resource. Instead, OpsRamp does the monitoring for us, and it generates the alerts based on the thresholds."
"The solution allows you to subscribe to the features you need and utilize CMDB, ITSM, and discovery on the same platform."
"The scalability of ServiceNow is good."
"From my perspective as an asset manager, the most valuable feature of the solution is the configuration management portion, where I can actively add something to the database."
"I like the solution due to the fact that it's scalable."
"It is a stable solution. I have not experienced any system outages during my time using the solution."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is the user interface."
"The most valuable features of the solution are discovery, cloud governance, event management, and service mapping."
"It is a product that is familiar for a lot of users."
"We would like this solution to be developed into a full CMP tool, so that we are able to use a single product for all of our cloud management needs."
"The function to search any particular device within this solution needs to be improved. Currently, the solution develops a lag when a search, or a comparison, is being carried out."
"Automation is currently quite complex and needs to be improved."
"The user interface of this product requires some changes as it is not inclusively user-friendly. For example, the performance indicators are color-based , which means that they are confusing for anyone who is color blind."
"An area of improvement would be application monitoring."
"I would like to see two things. The first is a self-service portal for the cloud, any cloud deployments, and the second is maturity validation towards ITSM, internalizing OpsRamp TSM. As a result, instead of integrating with more mature tools similar to ServiceNow, people will use OpsRamp."
"OpsRamp could improve the critical alerts. We have been receiving some false alerts when monitoring. For example, the alert shows the site is down, but when we try to do manual access to the URL, it's accessible."
"We have 55 AVDs, and patches might roll out to 32-35 initially, with the rest taking a month or so. OpsRamp can't detect them all directly. Since clients want patches applied as soon as possible, we manually patch those remaining devices."
"The pricing of some modules is higher because they are sold in packages. If we need something specific, we cannot take it individually."
"The product needs to add a workflow insight tool."
"ServiceNow could be more prescriptive on how customers can leverage some of the benefits."
"The pricing is high."
"There are some limitations with Discovery; some areas are not available in the installation. I would like the solution to be able to discover more devices. That will remove the need to have multiple tools."
"Service Mapping is a time-consuming process. The time and effort versus the benefits are very difficult to articulate to customers."
"It should have better integrations with other solutions."
"The time for deployment of ServiceNow IT Operations Management depends on many factors. It's a SaaS application, it should not take too long, but if you want to define the tool based on your processes, then it would take some time. It fully depends on the company's complexity. There are out-of-the-box product flows and if you want to use them, you can from day one. However, if you want to customize it and change it to your company's practices, then it will take more time. The setup could be faster."
More ServiceNow IT Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpsRamp is ranked 4th in Event Monitoring with 10 reviews while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ranked 2nd in Event Monitoring with 34 reviews. OpsRamp is rated 7.8, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpsRamp writes "Automates Azure resource monitoring and inventory management but slow with real-time patch status ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow IT Operations Management writes "A very capable solution that includes a valuable, user-friendly workflow management tool". OpsRamp is most compared with Datadog, SolarWinds NPM, LogicMonitor, Moogsoft and AppDynamics Server Monitoring, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management is most compared with Moogsoft, Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), Datadog, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and VMware Aria Operations. See our OpsRamp vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management report.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.