Compare Opvizor vs. Turbonomic
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does." "I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive." "We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomics, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective." "When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for." "I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault." "It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 423 Comparisons 216 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 491 Rating 10.0 | Views 10,607 Comparisons 4,999 Reviews 4 Average Words per Review 1,323 Rating 9.8 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 56% of the time. | Compared 43% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| VMTurbo Operations Manager | |
Learn | |
| Opvizor Video Not Available | Turbonomic |
Overview | |
| Opvizor puts you in control over everything you love about Vmware and automates all the rest. With Opvizor you will spend more time developing, designing, and implementing solutions to challenging problems and control every microdetail of your virtualized vSphere network with pinpoint-accurate, real-time monitoring and support tools | Turbonomic Application Resource Management matches application demand to infrastructure supply to continuously ensure application performance. The software integrates with leading APM and IT service management solutions to form a control plane to automate IT resource management, on-premises and in multicloud environments. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Opvizor | Learn more about Turbonomic |
Sample Customers | |
| Porsche Informatik, DZ Bank, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, FES, KSD, Hirslanden, Ekato, B2B, Galliker, Grand Resort, REWE Group, eBay, Globus, West Fleisch | JPMorgan Chase, First Canadian Title, UBS, Aetna, Alpha Maxx, London School of Economics, Expedia, JMC Steel Group, Southern Waste Systems. |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Healthcare Company14% Financial Services Firm14% Manufacturing Company12% Energy/Utilities Company8% Computer Software Company27% Comms Service Provider23% Financial Services Firm8% Retailer6% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business10% Midsize Enterprise27% Large Enterprise63% Small Business36% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise47% |
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, Turbonomic and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Opvizor is ranked 6th in Virtualization Management Tools with 1 review while Turbonomic is ranked 4th in Virtualization Management Tools with 10 reviews. Opvizor is rated 10.0, while Turbonomic is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Opvizor writes "Even moving the service over to another server can be done very easily. Although, having the ability to automate some things would be nice". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbonomic writes "Helps us optimize cloud operations, reducing our cloud costs". Opvizor is most compared with VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), whereas Turbonomic is most compared with VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), Densify, CloudHealth and VMware vRealize Automation (vRA).
See our list of best Virtualization Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.