Oracle Application Development Framework vs Spring MVC comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
1,561 views|1,027 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
1,709 views|1,203 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Application Development Framework and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring MVC Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ease of integration with other Oracle products.""It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in.""There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use.""The power of Oracle ADF is in the business components.""The most valuable features of this solution are the business components.""The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud.""The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides.""We can create objects that allow us to develop pages and applications very rapidly."

More Oracle Application Development Framework Pros →

"Spring has a speedy development process with a lightweight framework.""Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible. It comes with everything you would want in terms of security. If you want to access the database, you have the ability to do that.""Spring MVC is fast and reliable.""The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect.""The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities.""The most valuable features of Spring MVC are the modules, such as Spring Admin. All the Spring solutions work well together and are simple to maintain, such as the load balancing on the client side.""We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services.""Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

More Spring MVC Pros →

Cons
"The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization.""The UI is very slow and not up to market standard.""Lacks tailoring to geographic regional differences and consistent integration with third parties.""Oracle ADF needs more components and the layout can be improved.""I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster.""The performance of this solution needs to be improved because it is very slow.""The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved.""You need to have Oracle ADF on-premises to build a big project. You need to have a dependable front-end application."

More Oracle Application Development Framework Cons →

"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings.""The initial setup could be more straightforward.""The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas.""We would like the deployment of this solution to be easier as, at present, it is quite complicated.""Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications.""Spring IDE​ needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins.""I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security.""It could provide faster performance."

More Spring MVC Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this solution is approximately $47,000 USD per site."
  • "We use a lot of Oracle products and in total, we pay about £5 million ($6.1 million USD) per year."
  • "We have yearly licensing costs."
  • "The solution has an annual licensing cost and there are only standard fees. If you want Oracle support this is charged extra on top of the licensing fees."
  • "Oracle ADF is an expensive product. I don't know the actual figures, but our licensing costs for the year 2020, for example, were very high."
  • More Oracle Application Development Framework Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is free."
  • "Spring MVC is open source and free."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."
  • "We are using the open-source version of the solution."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • "It is an affordable solution."
  • More Spring MVC Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Oracle ADF is an expensive product. I don't know the actual figures, but our licensing costs for the year 2020, for example, were very high.
    Top Answer:The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization. On the View Controller part, the UI… more »
    Top Answer:The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities.
    Top Answer:In the future, I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    1,561
    Comparisons
    1,027
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    401
    Rating
    7.5
    3rd
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    1,709
    Comparisons
    1,203
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle ADF
    Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle ADF is an end-to-end Java EE framework that simplifies application development by providing out-of-the-box infrastructure services and a visual and declarative development experience. Oracle ADF simplifies Java EE development by minimizing the need to write code that implements the application’s infrastructure allowing the developers to focus on the features of the actual application. Oracle ADF provides these infrastructure implementations as part of the framework. It also implements the Model-View-Controller design pattern and offers an integrated solution that covers all the layers of the architecture integrated with the Oracle SOA and WebCenter Portal frameworks.

    Spring MVC is a Java web framework built on the Servlet API and has been included in the Spring Framework from the very beginning.  It handles web applications that use server-rendered HTML user interface, REST APIs, and much more.  The documentation includes Spring MVCView TechnologiesCORS Support, and WebSocket Support

    For baseline information and compatibility with Servlet container and Java EE version ranges please visit the Spring Framework Wiki.

    Sample Customers
    Financial Regulatory Authority (FRA) of Egypt, Red Samurai, ChB Jelly House
    EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring MVC
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring MVC and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Application Development Framework is ranked 8th in Java Frameworks with 9 reviews while Spring MVC is ranked 3rd in Java Frameworks with 16 reviews. Oracle Application Development Framework is rated 7.8, while Spring MVC is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Development Framework writes "Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring MVC writes "Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support". Oracle Application Development Framework is most compared with Spring Boot, Jakarta EE and Apache Spark, whereas Spring MVC is most compared with Jakarta EE, Spring Boot, Apache Spark, Open Liberty and Vert.x. See our Oracle Application Development Framework vs. Spring MVC report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.