Most Helpful Review
We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good.
We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.
The function test feature is valuable.
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needs
By using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.
The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.
By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.
The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved.
I would like to see better dashboards.
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.
We would like to have support for agile development.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I feel that the licenses are expensive.
It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.
out of 28 in Performance Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
out of 33 in Test Management Tools
Average Words per Review
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
|OATS||Micro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center|
|Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.|
Test more, test faster.
Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.
Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Learn more about Quality Center
|Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries||Quality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.|
Software R&D Company34%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Software R&D Company21%
Financial Services Firm10%