Compare Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The function test feature is valuable.""We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good.""We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.""The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros »

"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months.""You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution.""The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing.""The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer.""The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.""Ability to integrate with every other tool.""What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.""I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."

More Selenium HQ Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see better dashboards.""The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved.""The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons »

"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear.""The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem.""The solution's UI path needs to be modernized.""The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing.""I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.""Could have additional readability and abstraction.""Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.""There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."

More Selenium HQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We are satisfied with the pricing.""It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."

More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts.
Top Answer: There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.
Top Answer: I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.
Top Answer: The primary use of this solution is UI testing.
Ranking
20th
Views
4,124
Comparisons
2,621
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
7.7
4th
Views
15,284
Comparisons
12,527
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
419
Avg. Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
OATSSeleniumHQ
Learn
Oracle
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview
Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary IndustriesBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company5%
Retailer4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Retailer17%
Computer Software Company17%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise46%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 7.6, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Gives a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One, Apache JMeter and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Functional, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Catchpoint. See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.