Compare Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ

Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 7.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "It replaces manual regression testing, reducing testing time due to its cross-browser, parallel, and remote executions. But, it needs more support for IE and Safari". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Selenium HQ, UFT (QTP) and LoadRunner, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Eggplant Functional and Katalon Studio. See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good.We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.The function test feature is valuable.

Read more »

The primary benefit is its cost and the ability to use the cloud.Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run.Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.

Read more »

Cons
The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved.I would like to see better dashboards.

Read more »

It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background.In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues.Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%.It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly.‚ÄčTo simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
5,388
Comparisons
3,297
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
7.0
4th
Views
16,885
Comparisons
13,749
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
348
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
OATSSeleniumHQ
Learn
Oracle
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview
Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary IndustriesBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Retailer17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email