Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP)

Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "The three tools which I used most were Winrunner, QTP and OATS. I feel OATS is best". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with LoadRunner, UFT (QTP) and Selenium HQ. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify. See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Oracle application testing suite vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP)

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation.

Read more »

Cons
To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.It doesn’t support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this.You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process.

Read more »

For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.The licensing and pricing model is confusing.It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.

Read more »

Oracle application testing suite vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
11,652
Comparisons
5,271
Reviews
3
Followers
1,101
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
40,767
Comparisons
21,900
Reviews
23
Followers
2,363
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Oracle Application Testing Suite competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 19% of the time.
Smartbear%20software logo
Compared 14% of the time.
Worksoft twitter logo reasonably small
Compared 9% of the time.
See more UFT (QTP) competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsOATSMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Website/Video
Website/VideoOracle
  • Vendor 7751 screenshot 1524945170
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1527352786
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewApplication Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

OFFER
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersComic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Transportation Company
6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
31%
Insurance Company
19%
Healthcare Company
8%
Software R&D Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
44%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Pharma/Biotech Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
8%
Large Enterprise
58%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
9%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
7%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
82%
Oracle application testing suite vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email