Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify Comparison

Oracle Application Testing Suite

Worksoft Certify

Oracle Application Testing Suite

Read 2 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews.

3,953 views|2,532 comparisons

Worksoft Certify

Read 36 Worksoft Certify reviews.

14,364 views|4,034 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Oracle Application Testing Suite? Share your opinion.

Anonymous User

QA Developer II at a university

Easily develop test automation

Our company automates a lot of functional tests for SAP. The automated tests are included in larger integration tests of SAP transaction, workflows... Read more »

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good.""We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.""The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts." More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros »	"The ease of use is superior to anything on the market. It's very easy to integrate. We've been very impressed with the tool. Because we primarily use the configuration with SAP, the integration is pretty seamless. But we have used our own in-house VB app as well, and it's worked very well with that.""We love the Capture 2.0 feature. It seems to work very well.""The ability to work with the data, with recordsets, and plug those into the scripts is very easy and very powerful. We use it extensively.""It's script-free, which is really important for our end users because we are usually dealing with colleagues who are not developers and who do not always have the technical background of developing and scripting. It's very useful that there is a nice UI and the tool is script-free.""One big advantage of Worksoft Certify is its integration with SAP Solution Manager...""It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well.""If we write a new test that's 80 percent the same as an existing test, it is pretty straightforward to reuse the steps from existing tests for our new tests and build upon them.""It is very easy to maintain. With scripts, I can change one line and in one step. Whatever I want, I can do. I don't need to be an expert to use it." More Worksoft Certify Pros »
Cons
"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved.""The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly." More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons »	"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications.""The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on.""Our interactions with technical support has not been the best always and there is room for improvement especially with respect to the time taken to respond to cases. However, with the right contacts and reasonable escalations we have always managed to get quick attention on our cases.""One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version control of testing, it's all internally within the tool. If we have a test of a business process and want to revive that test, our methodology now is purely manual work. We go into the tool, create a copy of the existing test, and call the next one: v2. Now, we have two of them and the only way you can tell them apart is by its naming convention.""I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool.""We are looking for some enhancements on the Capture 2.0 tool. This would give us the ability to control it directly, like we could with Capture 1.0. Right now, Capture 2.0 doesn't really work for our Business Analysts.""There was a change to Capture 2.0. In the end, there have been some challenges with the newer version. Therefore, the company testers, the local ones, do not want to use Capture 2.0.""When it is unstable, there will be times when a test that we are running in Certify will just stop, and it will say, "Aborted." There will be errors. There will be no explanation as to why it happens. It has now happened maybe one out of 20 times. When it happens, I just tell our QA team to stop Certify and restart it, hoping we don't see it again." More Worksoft Certify Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.""It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment.""The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks.""Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost.""We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more.""We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future.""By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool.""Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Is Oracle Application Testing Suite or Micro Focus UFT One better for automating Oracle Fusion Applications? Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more » What do you like most about Oracle Application Testing Suite? Top Answer: The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts. Read all 3 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Application Testing Suite? Top Answer: There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.	What do you like most about Worksoft Certify? Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar… more » Read all 31 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify? Top Answer: The licensing is yearly. Read all 13 answers What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify? Top Answer: Looking at it as a product fully packaged, I would like to see more documentation or ease of use of the documentation. Sometimes documentation does exist but we have to search three different sites to… more » Read all 31 answers
Ranking
20th out of 44 in Functional Testing Tools Views 3,953 Comparisons 2,532 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 374 Rating 7.7	2nd out of 44 in Functional Testing Tools Views 14,364 Comparisons 4,034 Reviews 36 Average Words per Review 1,367 Rating 8.6
Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Compared 16% of the time. Selenium HQ vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Compared 14% of the time. Micro Focus UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Compared 12% of the time. Katalon Studio vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Compared 11% of the time. Eggplant Functional vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Compared 5% of the time. See more Oracle Application Testing Suite competitors » + Add more products to compare	Tricentis Tosca vs. Worksoft Certify Compared 32% of the time. Selenium HQ vs. Worksoft Certify Compared 26% of the time. Micro Focus UFT One vs. Worksoft Certify Compared 12% of the time. Eggplant Functional vs. Worksoft Certify Compared 4% of the time. Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify Compared 2% of the time. See more Worksoft Certify competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
OATS
Learn
Oracle	Worksoft
Overview
Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.	Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite Learn More	Learn more about Worksoft Certify Learn More
Sample Customers
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries	Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company45% Comms Service Provider13% Energy/Utilities Company7% Government6%	REVIEWERS Manufacturing Company28% Energy/Utilities Company13% Consumer Goods Company13% Logistics Company8% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider12% Manufacturing Company8% Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise13% Large Enterprise50%	REVIEWERS Small Business6% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise85% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business9% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise82%

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 36 reviews. Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 8.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Katalon Studio and Eggplant Functional, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Eggplant Functional and Ranorex Studio. See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify