We performed a comparison between Oracle BPEL and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has everything we need."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"It is a stable product."
"It's a good tool for workflow automation."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"The best part of Pega, for me, is that they let you reuse a lot of the aspects in the product."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The initial setup takes time."
"First-time customers will find its licensing tricky. The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets."
Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews. Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Oracle BPEL vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.