We performed a comparison between Oracle BPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"I find the data lineage features most valuable."
"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Oracle BPM is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Oracle BPM is rated 7.4, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.