We performed a comparison between Oracle BPM and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The solution provides extensive functionalities."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Oracle BPM is rated 7.4, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Camunda. See our Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
