We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Oracle offers more of the basic functionality needs."
"Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is about as stable as the other CSPs, but Oracle Cloud is more common in Korea."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases."
"The simple infrastructure of the service is very useful."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"Just having the many options and features offered by the product through the cloud is a major benefit."
"The environment is super fast so you get all the underlying machines behind the data. It's a good processing machine, especially in the Generation Two Cloud."
"Overall, there are some very good features on Oracle and it offers good customization capabilities."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"The product could use some more development and maturity so it has more peripheral functionality already integrated."
"The solution requires tighter integration capabilities."
"Lacking in additional PaaS services."
"I think that there could be a more user-friendly environment when it comes to the options that Oracle presents through the Oracle Cloud Platform."
"The solution isn't very mature. The on-premises deployment has more features and the cloud needs to work to match those options."
"The scalability requires some improvement. This is one of the most important things they need to get better at."
"In a future release, they could improve by adding some form of machine learning and artificial intelligence."
"I work with many clouds and I would say, in comparison, others have a better presentation of services and they have clearer steps in terms of implementation."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There is a subscription cost rather than licensing for this product."
"The price is fair, but we have to manage it to keep it low."
"On a monthly basis, we pay around $2,500 for licensing fees, with no additional costs. We do pay extra licensing for other on-premises solutions, but these are not related to Oracle Cloud Platform."
"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."
The Oracle Cloud Platform (also known as Platform as a Service or PaaS) provides a shared and elastically scalable platform for consolidation of existing applications and new application development and deployment. The Oracle Cloud Platform delivers cost savings through standardization and higher utilization of the shard platform across multiple applications.
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.
Oracle Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 10 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 21st in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews. Oracle Cloud Platform is rated 7.4, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Platform writes "Flexibility in supporting different capabilities and integrations make this excellent for moving to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Convenient and easy to set up with a lot of built-in features". Oracle Cloud Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure, IBM Public Cloud, OpenShift, Amazon AWS and Google Cloud, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Oracle Java Cloud Service, Microsoft Azure and Mendix.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.