Oracle Content Management vs Saperion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and Saperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.
Top Answer:Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration.
Top Answer:We use Content Management to supervise and control document access within our management structure. This involves establishing measures to efficiently manage and govern the content. Our approach… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
851
Comparisons
750
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
9.0
Views
319
Comparisons
201
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Saperion ECM helps you improve efficiency and fulfill compliance requirements — even when managing information trapped in unstructured documents such as invoices and emails.  Saperion automates document capture, processing, management and archiving, and allows immediate content retrieval throughout the enterprise.  It supports legal, operational and regulatory requirements. Security permissions ensure that only authorized users access the information they need.  Saperion enables seamless application integrations to help you adapt to ever-changing business needs.

Sample Customers
TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Government14%
Computer Software Company12%
Educational Organization8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Insurance Company12%
Real Estate/Law Firm12%
Government10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise61%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while Saperion is ranked 21st in Enterprise Content Management. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while Saperion is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Saperion writes "I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco, whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.