We performed a comparison between Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting and Protegrity Data Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking."This solution delivers the value that it is supposed to deliver."
"Its technical support team is helpful."
"The most valuable feature of Protegrity Data Security is the reduction of information being exposed."
"The product is stable."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"There are not a lot of templates available to use, so we had to start many things from scratch."
"Protegrity Data Security could improve by having more integration."
"Protegrity is using a different OS which has some bugs. Sometimes it's causing an initialization error."
"The solution's UI could be better."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 14th in Data Masking while Protegrity Data Security is ranked 5th in Data Masking with 3 reviews. Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0, while Protegrity Data Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Protegrity Data Security writes "Beneficial data security, good support, and straightforward initial setup". Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Advanced Security, whereas Protegrity Data Security is most compared with Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Microsoft Purview, Immuta, IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy and Oracle Advanced Security.
See our list of best Data Masking vendors.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
