Compare Oracle Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and maintain.""With Oracle Data Quality, the most valuable feature is entity matching.""I have found the most valuable features to be data cleansing and deduplication."

More Oracle Data Quality Pros »

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points.""The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes.""If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick.""The technical support is excellent.""In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features.""The product offers very good flexibility."

More SAS Data Management Pros »

Cons
"If the length of time required for deployment was reduced then it would be very helpful.""Oracle is currently not that intuitive. We need to use programmers to write code for a lot of the procedures. We need to have them write CL SQL code and write a CL script.""Oracle Data Quality should integrate with data warehousing solutions such as Azure and CWS Office. For example, having the ability to integrate with tools, such as Azure Synapse and SQL data warehousing would be a great benefit."

More Oracle Data Quality Cons »

"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics.""The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable.""We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive.""With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process.""One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place.""The solution could use better documentation."

More SAS Data Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The vendor needs to revisit their pricing strategy.""The price of this solution is comparable to other similar solutions."

More Oracle Data Quality Pricing and Cost Advice »

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

More SAS Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: With Oracle Data Quality, the most valuable feature is entity matching.
Top Answer: We are looking for a really good data integration tool. Oracle is currently not that intuitive. We need to use programmers to write code for a lot of the procedures. We need to have them write CL SQL… more »
Top Answer: We use it in the university fundraising industry. Once students graduate and start giving to the university, they become donors. Then, we need to maintain their giving history. Giving is quite… more »
Top Answer: The product offers very good flexibility.
Top Answer: I know that the pricing is on the higher end, in fact that was one of the other challenges where people were not really going to buy the product locally because it's pricing is higher. The reason for… more »
Top Answer: The stability could be a bit better. It's lacking in this area right now. The solution could use better documentation. It would be nice if the solution offered better training and certification for… more »
Ranking
7th
out of 41 in Data Quality
Views
354
Comparisons
205
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
528
Rating
8.0
2nd
out of 41 in Data Quality
Views
2,522
Comparisons
1,705
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
1,019
Rating
8.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Datanomic
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
Learn More
Overview
Oracle Enterprise Data Quality delivers a complete, best-of-breed approach to party and product data, resulting in trustworthy master data that integrates with applications to improve business insight.

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Data Quality
Learn more about SAS Data Management
Sample Customers
Roka Bioscience, Statistics Centre _ Abu Dhabi , Raymond James Financial inc., CaixaBank, Industrial Bank of Korea, Posco, NHS Business Services Authority, RWE Power, LIFE Financial Group,
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government29%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Data Quality is ranked 7th in Data Quality with 3 reviews while SAS Data Management is ranked 2nd in Data Quality with 6 reviews. Oracle Data Quality is rated 8.0, while SAS Data Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Data Quality writes "Easy to use and maintain, integrates well, and can handle any type of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Management writes "One-stop-shop solution for sorting, categorizing and summarizing your data". Oracle Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Data Quality, whereas SAS Data Management is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Axon, Palantir Gotham, Collibra Governance and Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog. See our Oracle Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.