We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's ROI is excellent."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"The application development is very user-friendly."
"The solution is very fast."
"The most valuable feature is that Database-In-Memory is more consistent and faster than traditional databases as it requires fewer CPUs to process instructions."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The scalability is very good."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."
"The product is good for tuning."
"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."
"The solution's performance is good."
"It is very easy to start working with the product."
"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."
"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."
"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."
"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."
"The user interface is not simple."
"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."
"The product has many bugs."
"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 27 reviews while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is ranked 11th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service writes "A stable solution that can be used to perform on-premises to cloud migrations". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server and MariaDB, whereas Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon Aurora, MySQL, Firebird SQL, Percona Server and PostgreSQL. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
