We performed a comparison between Oracle Dyn Web Application Security and Zscaler Internet Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The initial setup is pretty easy."
"One on the main benefits is protection all time from anywhere."
"The most valuable features I found in Zscaler Internet Access are the restriction of users for a particular URL, the security feature related to stopping DDoS, and the VPN."
"The solution offers a distributed organization to master and to control all of the endpoints."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Zscaler covers all the features needed to replace a VPN or proxy solution. They are good. They've been on the market for 15 years now, so they are mature enough."
"One feature that is valuable to me from an implementation point of view is that it's very easy to implement."
"We use ZIA for outbound internet connectivity. The internet traffic of on-prem users will be directed to the ZIA cloud for security checks and web filtering."
"There is no lag in service when accessing the internet."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
"Technical support could be better."
"Zscaler Internet Access could improve by adding a VPN feature."
"The OS capabilities and WSL support could be improved."
"Currently, the solution's interface is not that user-friendly."
"I would like to see more training and video documentation."
"Zscaler needs to add client-to-client communication. It's always client-to-server communication. The cloud and branch connectors could be improved because we're still dependent on traditional firewalls. They should eliminate this. They should also provide WAN devices should to compete with the SD-WAN solutions also."
"Zscaler should continue to make the user interface better. They should also improve the backup network and continue to expand it so that it can handle larger numbers of customers."
"In every cloud service in the world, you have multiple upstream internet providers to create diversity so that if one of your providers fails, your network just continues. In South Africa, there is only one upstream provider, and that's not right. That that's a problem."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Zscaler Internet Access is ranked 2nd in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 46 reviews. Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0, while Zscaler Internet Access is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Internet Access writes "Provides integrated CASB and file sandboxing but could be less expensive ". Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with , whereas Zscaler Internet Access is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and FortiSASE .
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.