We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
"It is a very well-rounded product. It is a complete package with all the features using which we are able to manage our PCs very efficiently."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
"The cloud account management is a valuable feature."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"It is easy to install, and quick to deploy."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The dashboards are great for gathering analytic information and seeing where the problems are."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"There's no way to say, "I want this maintenance window to be on the second Tuesday of the month." It's strict. This window is this and that's it. You can't fluctuate."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"There are limited numbers of other OEM devices that can be integrated into enterprise management that can be scaled by Oracle by adding other OEM devices to enterprise management."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The product is pretty comprehensive, but quite resource hungry. This might be due to the majority of the application seemingly being written in Java."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 122 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and New Relic. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.