We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetSuite, Oracle, SAP and others in Cloud ERP."The solution is approximately 70 percent scalable. We have more than 100 people using the solution in my organization."
"The solution is user-friendly with a good integration layer."
"I use Oracle ERP Cloud for implementation support."
"The main component is Oracle Financial. It is one of the most comprehensive financial solutions available on the market."
"Oracle ERP Cloud is a well-established and well-known product that is cost-effective for the customer."
"I find that the overall framework and database structure is quite comprehensive."
"Built-in business intelligence has real-time reporting features that are quite handy."
"The product has good functionality."
"The solution makes its use and the management of our infrastructure easy."
"It's helped with business aspects and improved material planning and RMA processes."
"From a technological point of view, the in-memory database is one of the key highlights."
"In terms of its most valuable feature, I would say the finance module."
"I have been using SAP for more than 13 years and the new SAP S4HANA was not only a simple upgrade, they have made a lot of improvements. They have simplified a lot of the functions, the all-new interface gives users a better experience. The database itself is quite efficient in nature and it provides effective data queries. It is a good upgrade from the previous version of SAP R/3."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"I have found the user interface very modern and it has simplified many user jobs, such as the embedded logistics. They have introduced central finance which has been a benefit."
"The expenses mobile app calculates different mileages than the URL version."
"UI is not very presentable for a cloud solution."
"You need a lot of knowledge to set up Oracle ERP Cloud."
"The stability is not as good as Informatica, but this is very good."
"I would like to improve the tool’s budgeting and reporting. I know that Oracle is working on the tool’s analytics part so I expect the analytical feature in its future releases."
"The tool must enable users to customize the reports."
"In terms of areas for improvement, there are still a lot of other features that need to be incorporated into the future releases of Oracle ERP Cloud. We're hoping those would come soon because they're available in other ERP systems. For example, we used to have a lot of AME customizations in the BPM, but now we have a very limited scope, so it would be great if we could extend our scope. Currently, we are working with product teams to get through some of those solutions, and how we could implement them, so we have some workarounds to deal with, but we still have a long road ahead."
"The Oracle ERP Cloud accounts payable could be improved."
"Documentation could be improved."
"So, there is room for improvement in pricing. HANA is not a simple product; it's quite complex by design."
"The Capex and Opex could be improved."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"The resource usage could be improved - it's memory-hungry, so mid-range servers struggle to run it."
"The initial setup could be better. They can make the process a little easier. The functions that we require will be available in the next release. We specifically need a new model, and I think we have some versions to implement. I already read on the SAP website that some functionalities we are waiting for are available in this new version."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"We found that the implementing partners themselves are struggling with S4HANA's features. It's not an exact translation of the older ECC, so SAP has taken a new route to do things with S4HANA. Maybe it's a good product, but the implementing partners also like to have an in-depth understanding of the full feature set the product offers."
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is ranked 2nd in Cloud ERP with 34 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP writes "Everything can be found in one place and it is all embedded in a single system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is most compared with NetSuite ERP, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP Business One and SAP S/4HANA Cloud, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle E-Business Suite and NetSuite ERP.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
