"The solution is stable."
"Overall, the performance of the solution is very good."
"It offers a wealth of features, including LOBs and triggers, making it a comprehensive platform."
"The most important thing is the reliability. The over-all user control is very important as is data security. The application is efficient. All of these factors are important to our usage of Oracle forms."
"It's a very old product, and therefore, very seldom do you need to get in contact with technical support for issues. It's very stable."
"The most valuable features are the low-code RAD, performance, and intuitive design."
"The solution is beneficial."
"The GUI needs improvement."
"It's quite an old product. It may be easier to use if it were a web application."
"User interaction and the overall user interface design should be significantly improved in the next critical version to make it more user-friendly and intuitive."
"The restriction on methods of exporting results of development needs to be more flexible."
"The solution should be integrated with Oracle Reports."
"The solution could improve by having a web-style rendered UI."
"They should improve its initial setup process."
Oracle Forms is ranked 1st in Software Components with 9 reviews while Oracle Java Mission Control is ranked 4th in Software Components with 3 reviews. Oracle Forms is rated 8.0, while Oracle Java Mission Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Forms writes "A robust development tool offering strong data security and exceptional scalability capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Mission Control writes "It helps our application developers to improve performance in future releases of the applications they are working on". Oracle Forms is most compared with Oracle Reports and ZK Framework, whereas Oracle Java Mission Control is most compared with .
See our list of best Software Components vendors.
We monitor all Software Components reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.