Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 8th in Application Server with 1 review vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix which is ranked 9th in Application Server. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "The HR business process execution is much easier with the implementation of this solution". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, JBoss and IBM WebSphere Application Server. TIBCO ActiveMatrix is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle WebLogic Server and WSO2 Governance Registry.

Oracle Fusion Middleware

TIBCO ActiveMatrix

31814

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Based on 1 review.

19121

TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Most Helpful Review

OracleFuc4e2

Oracle Fusion HCM Senior Consultant

The HR business process execution is much easier with the implementation of this solution

All our customers agree, the HR business process execution is much easier and their lives have become better.

Use TIBCO ActiveMatrix? Share your opinion.

Have A Question About Application Server?

Our experts can help. 291,767 professionals have used our research on 6,544 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
My advice is to buy the basic modules first, gain the most benefit from them, then buy the advanced modules. Read more »	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 291,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	8th out of 20 In Application Server Views 236 Comparisons 191 Reviews 1 Followers 61 Avg. Rating 8.0	9th out of 20 In Application Server Views 1,744 Comparisons 1,239 Reviews 0 Followers 200 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware Compared 36% of the time. JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware Compared 24% of the time. IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware Compared 17% of the time. See more Oracle Fusion Middleware competitors »	Oracle SOA Suite vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Compared 70% of the time. Oracle WebLogic Server vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Compared 9% of the time. WSO2 Governance Registry vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Compared 6% of the time. See more TIBCO ActiveMatrix competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As		ActiveMatrix
Website/Video
Website/Video	Oracle	TIBCO
Overview
Overview	Oracle Fusion Middleware is the digital business platform for the enterprise and the cloud. It enables enterprises to create and run agile, intelligent business applications while maximizing IT efficiency through full utilization of modern hardware and software architectures.	TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.
OFFER
Learn more about Oracle Fusion Middleware Learn More	Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Information Not Available	Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)

Have A Question About Application Server?

Our experts can help. 291,767 professionals have used our research on 6,544 solutions.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.