We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Middleware and Tomcat based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"Data integrity."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"The scalability is good."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to host applications."
"I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten, where one is high price and ten is low price. The pricing is pretty low."
"The most valuable feature is how simple it is to deploy the solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it supports Java Enterprise."
"Our company doesn't face any stability issues while using Tomcat."
"One of the most valuable features of Tomcat is its compatibility with the Apache web server and its ease of configuration. It is simple to set up and maintain and allows for easy management of database connections, transactions, and isolation. Overall, Tomcat is a user-friendly application server that makes it easy to manage various aspects of database interactions."
"The solution integrates smoothly with the development environment. The integration process is straightforward. You only need to configure the project in your IDE. With intelligent features, the integration becomes even easier. Once integrated, deployment into our application is straightforward. Previously, we sometimes relied on manual deployment processes or used a separate application manager. However, with this solution, deployment is simplified."
"The solution is readily available and open-source."
"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."
"The price could always be better."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"The setup is complex and could be improved."
"The solution cannot host .NET applications."
"Tomcat needs to improve its stability."
"It will be useful if a direct report concerning a particular server configuration or application usage is readily available in the dashboard."
"If Apache can come up with a better solution to provide better security, that would be ideal."
"Performance optimization is an area of concern in Tomcat that should be made better."
"The product's pricing needs improvement."
"The disability and memory management is a problem with the solution and has room for improvement."
Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews while Tomcat is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 42 reviews. Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0, while Tomcat is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tomcat writes "A lightweight tool that offers efficiency in terms of memory and resource usage". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix, whereas Tomcat is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, JBoss, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and Oracle Application Server. See our Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Tomcat report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
