We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."It is quite scalable."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"The solution is useful for data transformation."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"GoldenGate enables us to merge and transform data from various sources in real time. It's a powerful tool that can read and load most data sources."
"OpenAPI supported me integrating Oracle Warehouse Builder with DevOps solutions like versioning (CVS, Subversion, and Git), ticket systems (Bugzilla and Jira), and test automatization (HPQC) as well as with professional ALM solutions (HP ALM and IKAN ALM)."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"Monitoring must be a bit more enhanced."
"It would be great if Oracle added some enhanced features or more functionalities to Oracle GoldenGate."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The solution needs to improve its latency, monitoring and support."
"The main problem of Oracle GoldenGate is that sometimes, the processes get abended. Data consistency is also challenging."
"Unfortunately, a next release of Oracle Warehouse Builder will not happen but a wide range of customers still use the available features together with the current Oracle 11g or 12c database environments."
More Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] writes "Can be enhanced with extra functionality, but no further support will be given for the solution". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
