We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."
"It works best with Oracle."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"The solution's existing SaaS platform for data integration gives us an edge."
"The product is reliable for data integrity."
"Oracle GoldenGate helps to select and target specific tables for replication. Any changes or operations on those tables are immediately reflected in the source and target environments."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"IBM CDC has one central control while Oracle GoldenGate has two controls. In IBM CDC we can do all things in frontend. The solution needs to incorporate a feature where we can connect it to a standby database."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while SAP Replication Server is ranked 27th in Data Integration with 6 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while SAP Replication Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Replication Server writes "Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SAP Replication Server is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Fivetran, Azure Data Factory, SSIS and SAP Data Services. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. SAP Replication Server report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.