We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We use the tool to pull on-prem data."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"It is quite scalable."
"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."
"The stability is excellent."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The solution basically conforms to our standards."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The installation process is easy."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"The customization can be a bit difficult."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Mule ESB. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
