Oracle Hudson CI vs SemaphoreCI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
104 views|82 comparisons
SemaphoreCI Logo
251 views|215 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Hudson CI and SemaphoreCI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
104
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
251
Comparisons
215
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hudson CI
Learn More
SemaphoreCI
Video Not Available
Overview

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
With Semaphore, you can easily automate the process of software testing and delivery in the cloud. It is designed to be easy to use and engineered for high performance. It automatically test your app after every change, thus finding bugs before they reach your users. Whenever somebody pushes new code to GitHub or Bitbucket, Semaphore immediately runs all tests, along with any security and style checks that you’ve defined. Once you start using Semaphore, every build automatically becomes a part of the GitHub or Bitbucket pull request review process. It tests multiple projects and branches simultaneously as you push new commits. By default Semaphore automatically builds every new branch in your Git repository. Semaphore’s custom-made platform for Docker equips you with unrestricted access to latest Docker CLI toolchain, including container image caching. Safety net provided by automated CI builds: check. Next up: move even faster with continuous deployment. With a unified workflow for the entire team, Semaphore enables the team to roll-in revisions and gain feedback faster by automatically deploying verified versions of code.
Sample Customers
Virgin Media
Dribble, Art Sy, 500px, General Assembly, CrunchBase, Lexmark
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation while SemaphoreCI is ranked 23rd in Build Automation. Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0, while SemaphoreCI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins, whereas SemaphoreCI is most compared with CircleCI, Jenkins and GitHub Actions.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.