Oracle Hudson CI vs Solano CI comparison

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

• Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
• Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.

Solano CI makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale a continuous integration service in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient and resizable capacity while managing time-consuming systems administration tasks, freeing you up to focus on your applications and business. Solano CI can be run on servers operated by customers, or on machines operated by the company, or by the public cloud services of Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform.