Oracle Hudson CI vs Travis CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
104 views|82 comparisons
Travis CI Logo
631 views|774 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Hudson CI and Travis CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Oracle Hudson CI?
Anonymous User
Ranking
32nd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
104
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
631
Comparisons
774
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Tekton logo
Compared 60% of the time.
GitLab logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 16% of the time.
TeamCity logo
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Hudson CI
Learn More
Travis CI
Video Not Available
Overview

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.
Sample Customers
Virgin Media
Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation while Travis CI is ranked 17th in Build Automation. Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0, while Travis CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Travis CI writes "Bamboo vs. Travis CI vs. Circle CI vs. Codeship". Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins, whereas Travis CI is most compared with Tekton, GitLab, Jenkins and TeamCity.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.