We performed a comparison between Oracle Hyperion and UNIT4 prevero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."Scalability is one of this solution's big plus points."
"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."
"It is easy to use. It is very intuitive. Even though there is a lot of functionality that comes out of the box, you can customize the solutions to meet your needs. You have the ability to have business rules that produce all kinds of calculations. We're international, and we do all our FX conversions through that."
"The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting."
"Oracle Hyperion is an engine allowing you to build whatever you want on it."
"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."
"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."
"We can integrate with any system and pull data from SAP or SQL Server. We can also design our own role files to establish how we pull the file data and store it in our database."
"Its workflow is straightforward and simple to understand."
"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."
"The level of complexity of the implementation is always a challenge."
"The Oracle technical support in our area is terrible."
"The reporting feature in Oracle Hyperion isn't the best. It needs improvement."
"The initial setup of Oracle Hyperion is very difficult."
"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."
"Oracle Hyperion generally it's quite a complex architecture that is hard to maintain."
"The analytics could be improved."
"There is a little bit of reliance upon understanding the syntax of the actions that you want to take. Some of the other competitors have moved forward with that in terms of being able to make it more drag and drop and more logical, but there is still some way to go for UNIT4 in doing that, but they're getting there. With all these things, automation helps. The more they can do to simplify some of the complexities from the financial reporting, evaluation, and analysis sides, the better it would be. I'd like to see more automation and more simplicity from an end-user point of view."
Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 49 reviews while UNIT4 prevero is ranked 21st in Business Performance Management with 1 review. Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0, while UNIT4 prevero is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A world-class solution that provides a lot of functionality out of the box and also allows you to customize it to meet your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UNIT4 prevero writes "Workflow is straightforward and simple to understand, but there should be more automation and more simplicity from an end-user point of view". Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Tableau, Anaplan, IBM Cognos, Oracle HFM and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas UNIT4 prevero is most compared with Board.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.