We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"The OIC is very good."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"It is a very stable product."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"Support is expensive."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and IBM App Connect. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.