We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support responds quickly."
"It is a scalable solution."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"Zapier's interface, for me, is the solution's greatest value proposition. It is designed and developed for people who don't have a clue about what they're trying to do. It has a very user-friendly interface."
"Zapier luckily has a wide range of integrations, I would say."
"Zapier handles everything under the sun that you would think you need in automation. It is the most mature integration platform and service on the market."
"The solution is a SaaS and does not require a complex setup."
"Webhooks are the most valuable feature of Zapier."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is very intuitive and has a very flat learning curve."
"The connection between Facebook lead forms and MailChimp integrations is the most valuable feature."
"Zapier’s most valuable feature is its ability to interconnect applications or devices."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"The solution is expensive."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"There is room for improvement in the support. They are not responsive, and they don't take much time to get resolved."
"It is not worth the money if you have a little bit of a technical mind...Zapier is not able to set up different modules. When automation doesn't work, it's not that easy to find why it didn't work."
"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."
"System-to-system is fine, but when it comes to system-to-user, where Zapier is helping to communicate to a user, that's a one-way communication. If that user has to perform some action on that notification, the action isn't handled by Zapier. So there's no way to orchestrate that and it's very cumbersome."
"My biggest concern with Zapier would be their pricing strategy."
"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."
"Being able to share Zaps and organize them with teammates would allow sharing and refining scenarios and even combining steps that require different people's credentials."
"Zapier needs to improve in the same way most RPA solutions should, such as Robocorp, Make, or UiPath. They are not good at helping you find the connections that you need for the problem that you have. For example, if need something on Instagram. I'm going to have to do research for hours to be able to find the components or the app, which is going to do what I need it to do. It makes it difficult to use the system when you don't know what to use."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while Zapier is ranked 10th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while Zapier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zapier writes "A tool for automation purposes requiring an easy initial setup while offering a very helpful technical support team ". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory, whereas Zapier is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer, Tray.io, MuleSoft Composer and Quickwork . See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. Zapier report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
