Oracle Java Cloud Service vs OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Java Cloud Service and OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds.
To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is somewhat expensive."
  • "Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."
  • More Oracle Java Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    19th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    285
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    7.5
    Unranked
    In PaaS Clouds
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

    For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

    OrangeScape PaaS Platform brings in a new paradigm of developing business applications. It helps you build comprehensive business applications using a visual style modeling interface in a 5GL environment. This is done through OrangeScape Studio on browser.
    Sample Customers
    Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company
    [24]7 Inc, India Infoline, United Biscuits, AstraZeneca, Sterlite, Citi, eNoah, Ford, Phizer, Macmillan, sify
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company29%
    University14%
    Insurance Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    PaaS Clouds
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews while OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in PaaS Clouds. Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] writes "Supports fast application development and interfaces well with our back-end systems". Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon AWS, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure, whereas OrangeScape PaaS Cloud [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

    We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.