We performed a comparison between Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Operations Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution provides different types of logs like audit, service, and API logs."
"The most valuable feature is mapping."
"The IT analysis provides the best solution as to how the infrastructure is going."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"It is simple."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"Reporting is sometimes a little slow."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The logs in the solution are dispersed in different layers, so we have to pick the logs from different areas."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"They need a little more self-service."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"It was challenging onboarding users."
More Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is ranked 8th in IT Operations Analytics with 3 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 4th in IT Operations Analytics with 42 reviews. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is rated 7.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service writes "Provides different types of logs, but the logs are dispersed in different layers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
