We performed a comparison between IBM FlashSystem and Oracle Pillar Axiom 600 [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).Earn 20 points
IBM FlashSystem is ranked 2nd in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 106 reviews while Oracle Pillar Axiom 600 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). IBM FlashSystem is rated 8.2, while Oracle Pillar Axiom 600 [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM FlashSystem writes "An easy GUI and simple provisioning but our model does not support compression". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Pillar Axiom 600 [EOL] writes "Provides ease of use with a straightforward GUI. I would like to see better support". IBM FlashSystem is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell Unity XT, NetApp AFF and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, whereas Oracle Pillar Axiom 600 [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.