Compare Oracle Private Cloud Appliance vs. Oracle SuperCluster

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FlexPod, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"FlexPod has improved our company as far as ease of management, stability, and redundancy.""All of our main applications run on this solution, and it has done a stellar job.""FlexPod is easy to setup, maintain and has great stability.""The agility is probably the most valuable feature for us. It's very easy to send out resources.""The biggest lesson that I have learned from this solution is the ease of actually setting it up and learning it.""It is definitely easier for us to maintain and do build-outs, so it takes a lot less time to set things up for the customer.""It's a kind of one-stop shop as far as support goes.""This solution has helped to make more things consistent within our organization."

More FlexPod Pros »

"You will find the high availability and License Team with Oracle very valuable."

More Oracle Private Cloud Appliance Pros »

"The performance is significantly improved, and the administration is easy because it is a single platform end-to-end.""Our primary use case is for E-Business Suite applications the applications for the government, and most of the applications that use an HCM.""Scalability and technical support.""The two features that I find to be the most valuable are high availability and high performance.""Unix is not as easy for the users, it needs more maintenance and costs extra."

More Oracle SuperCluster Pros »

"The initial learning curve is pretty steep.""This solution is very hard to maintain and keep up.""One touch upgrades would be nice.""I'd like to see some more Ansible integration for automation purposes. We automate everything else with Ansible, so it would be great if we could automate our FlexPod with Ansible as well.""The procedure for contacting technical support could be simplified.""As we do much of the Tier-I support ourselves, and thus don't normally need it, there is time wasted in moving up to the next level.""The biggest thing that I would like to see is more cost-effective FlexPod solutions.""On the NetApp side, there are definitely things to improve in terms of software updates."

More FlexPod Cons »

"The initial setup was very complex."

More Oracle Private Cloud Appliance Cons »

"If they had an application that centralized the administration, not about the monitoring, but for the configuration, it would be better.""It's not working as we expected. We thought it would be fast and reliable but we are not getting the reliability. It's not stable.""Not a very user friendly solution.""They may have made some improvements but based on the version that I am using, it is a little complicated because it is based on the Unix Operating system."

More Oracle SuperCluster Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Cost is the primary factor behind why I would not give this product a perfect rating.""It is not going to save you money, but that is not the point. The opportunity to stay competitive in the marketplace is not a cost.""We have a lease for approximately $10,000 USD per month.""We pay approximately $1,400 USD in total for between five-thousand and ten-thousand ports.""It is not cheap, but there is a return on investment in time saved and efficiency.""The solution has saved our customers' organization in terms of CapEx. E.g., with the cloud availability, it's turned into sort of a hybrid CapEx/OpEx model.""The main return on investment would be that instead of having to refresh all of our desktop hardware we have been able to go reimage existing machines and use those as thin clients, then also purchase new thin clients rather than buying actual hardware. It also reduces the overhead of having our technicians deploy those systems and maintain them.""Our licensing costs are about $50,000 per year."

More FlexPod Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Scalability and technical support.
Top Answer: We pay an annual licensing fee but that's not my department.
Top Answer: The solution is not very user friendly and that could be improved.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle MiniCluster, S7-2, M7, M6-32
Learn More

The FlexPod platform, developed by NetApp and Cisco, is a flexible, converged infrastructure solution that delivers prevalidated storage, networking, and server technologies. It’s designed to increase IT responsiveness to business demands while reducing your overall cost of computing. Think maximum uptime, minimal risk

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance, is an integrated infrastructure system engineered to enable rapid deployment of converged compute, network, and storage technologies for hosting applications or workloads on a guest OS. It is a data center-class system that provides incremental and scalable performance optimized for consolidation of mixed workloads.

Secure cloud infrastructure with the industry’s most advanced security, extreme performance, and a complete suite of efficiency enhancements, tools, and automation that work together to dramatically lower cost and complexity.

Learn more about FlexPod
Learn more about Oracle Private Cloud Appliance
Learn more about Oracle SuperCluster
Sample Customers
University of Sao Paulo, WD-40, The Commonwell Mutual Insurance Group
Agnitum Information Technologies, Mediacloud, Xait AS, Atos Global Managed Services, CaixaBI, ICA AB, BT Spain, Secure-24, Xait
Advania, Dimension Data, Atos, Etisilat Nigeria, HDFC, Specialized Bicycle Components, Uganda Revenue Authority, iQor, United Energy, Portic Barcelona, B Logistics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CSC, CNSI, REDISA
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company13%
Computer Software Company53%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company4%
Financial Services Firm29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Logistics Company14%
Computer Software Company46%
Financial Services Firm10%
Comms Service Provider7%
Company Size
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise68%
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise58%
No Data Available
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about FlexPod, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is ranked 6th in Converged Infrastructure with 1 review while Oracle SuperCluster is ranked 8th in Converged Infrastructure with 4 reviews. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is rated 6.0, while Oracle SuperCluster is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Private Cloud Appliance writes "Has high availability but the management can be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SuperCluster writes "Great performance and Technical support but cannot integrate with the newest version". Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is most compared with HPE ConvergedSystem, Dell EMC VxBlock System, Rackspace OpenStack and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Oracle SuperCluster is most compared with Dell EMC VxBlock System and Dell PowerEdge VRTX.

See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.