Compare Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs. SiteScope

Oracle Real User Experience Insight is ranked 21st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews while SiteScope is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. Oracle Real User Experience Insight is rated 9.0, while SiteScope is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Real User Experience Insight writes "Good availability, a simple initial setup, and is easy to upload to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". Oracle Real User Experience Insight is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring, New Relic APM and AppDynamics, whereas SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Splunk, SCOM and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. See our Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs. SiteScope report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs. SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
425,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The availability of the solution is its most valuable aspect. I can also Google anything I want and upload it on the cloud. I can do that using the mobile app. It is very helpful.The most valuable feature is the ability to Drill down to webpage actions.

More Oracle Real User Experience Insight Pros »

For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.

More SiteScope Pros »

Cons
It would be nice if the solution could be integrated with Outlook. If I'm signing any quotation, any proposal, or any of my communications, I should be able to update that Oracle application as well.The application resource usage has increased due to using RUEI.

More Oracle Real User Experience Insight Cons »

SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL.It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test.They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.

More SiteScope Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles.

More SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
425,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
611
Comparisons
308
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
285
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
3,378
Comparisons
2,164
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
567
Avg. Rating
6.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Oracle Real User Experience Insight, Oracle RUEIMicro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope
Learn
Oracle
Micro Focus
Overview

Oracle Real User Experience Insight, Oracle's on-premises management platform, providing a single pane of glass for management of Oracle environments, whether in customer data centers or in Oracle Cloud that integrates performance analysis and usage analysis into a single offering, enabling business and IT stakeholders to develop a shared understanding into their application users' experience. Oracle Real User Experience Insight's non-intrusive monitoring capability is built using state-of-the-art Network Protocol Analysis (NPA) technology, which does not require any modification, changes, or instrumentation of the application. Its passive monitoring approach allows enterprises to deploy in production, without requiring costly test/QA environment validations.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Real User Experience Insight
Learn more about SiteScope
Sample Customers
Hover Automotive India, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Daelim Industrial, MakeMyTrip, Acorn Paper Products Company, KEC International, Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali, The Qatar Olympic CommitteeVodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Software R&D Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company46%
Government11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Real User Experience Insight vs. SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
425,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.