We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"The stability has been good."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."
"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."
"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"It might help if, in the documentation, there were a comments section or some kind of community input. I might read a page of documentation and not fully understand everything, or it might not quite answer the question I had. If there were a section associated with it where people could discuss the same topic, that might be helpful because somebody else might have already asked the question that I had."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.