Compare Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Service Bus Logo
5,283 views|3,827 comparisons
Red Hat Fuse Logo
6,804 views|4,306 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn.""The most valuable feature is the adapters.""The ability to master the process in one location.""The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications.""I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications.""Overall it is a pretty good solution.""The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far.""I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."

More Oracle Service Bus Pros »

"The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.""The most valuable feature is the software development environment.""We usually had used PowerCenter for master data integration (by replication). But in some cases, it was better to use Fuse for providing the master data online. It doesn't make it necessary to replicate data.""The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."

More Red Hat Fuse Pros »

Cons
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why.""This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters.""There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin.""This solution should work better with RESTful services.""The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity.""The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production.""The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations.""The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."

More Oracle Service Bus Cons »

"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.""Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly.""I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process.""Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

More Red Hat Fuse Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."

More Oracle Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation.
Top Answer: The licensing process needs to be simplified. It's confusing and tedious. It's very hard to get concrete details out of Oracle in a timely manner. It would be ideal if they could be more exact and… more »
Top Answer: The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster.
Top Answer: The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default… more »
Top Answer: In terms of price, it depends on the package the client signs.
Top Answer: Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible.
Ranking
5th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
5,283
Comparisons
3,827
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
429
Rating
8.4
8th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
6,804
Comparisons
4,306
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
539
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
Learn More
Overview

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Service Bus
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Sample Customers
MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm5%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise47%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in ESB with 8 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 8th in ESB with 4 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 8.4, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "A pretty good solution with helpful plugins and reasonable pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Default settings are enough to handle most requirements, but needs more flexibility". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and webMethods Integration Server. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.