Compare Oracle Service Bus vs. Sopera Advanced Service Factory

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn.""The most valuable feature is the adapters.""The ability to master the process in one location.""The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications.""I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications.""Overall it is a pretty good solution.""The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far.""I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."

More Oracle Service Bus Pros »

"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."

More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pros »

Cons
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why.""This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters.""There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin.""This solution should work better with RESTful services.""The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity.""The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production.""The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations.""The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."

More Oracle Service Bus Cons »

"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."

More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."

More Oracle Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is less expensive than competitors."

More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far.
Top Answer: The licensing process needs to be simplified. It's confusing and tedious. It's very hard to get concrete details out of Oracle in a timely manner. It would be ideal if they could be more exact and… more »
Top Answer: I can't recall coming across any missing features. There isn't anything glaring that is lacking in the product. The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations. In terms of the solution… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
5th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
5,283
Comparisons
3,827
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
429
Rating
8.4
11th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
40
Comparisons
6
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
478
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Advanced Service Factory
Learn More
Overview

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

Information Not Available
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Service Bus
Learn more about Sopera Advanced Service Factory
Sample Customers
MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm5%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise47%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in ESB with 8 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 11th in ESB with 1 review. Oracle Service Bus is rated 8.4, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "A pretty good solution with helpful plugins and reasonable pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Red Hat Fuse, webMethods Integration Server and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.