Compare Oracle Service Bus vs. webMethods Integration Server

Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in ESB with 5 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 1st in ESB with 13 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Functional message delivery service, but there are issues with monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Service Bus vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
396,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The ability to master the process in one location.The most valuable feature is the adapters.I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications.This product is not complicated and very easy to learn.It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols.It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second.

Read more »

A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.

Read more »

Cons
There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin.This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters.The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity.There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why.It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable.

Read more »

The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB.

Read more »

It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
396,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
6,286
Comparisons
4,741
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
354
Avg. Rating
8.3
1st
out of 24 in ESB
Views
15,685
Comparisons
10,833
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
310
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Learn
Oracle
Software AG
Overview

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Service Bus
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAPFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company45%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government7%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company20%
Software R&D Company20%
Insurance Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Service Bus vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
396,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.