We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"The stability is excellent."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 25 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 18 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB and Talend Open Studio. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.