Compare Oracle Sun 6000 vs. PowerEdge C

Oracle Sun 6000 is ranked 15th in Blade Servers while PowerEdge C is ranked 11th in Blade Servers. Oracle Sun 6000 is rated 0, while PowerEdge C is rated 0. On the other hand, Oracle Sun 6000 is most compared with Cisco UCS B-Series, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with HPE Apollo, HPE Moonshot and Super Micro SuperBlade.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Sun 6000 Logo
117 views|86 comparisons
PowerEdge C Logo
430 views|345 comparisons
Ranking
15th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
117
Comparisons
86
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
430
Comparisons
345
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Also Known As
Sun 6000
Learn
Oracle
Dell EMC
Overview

Oracle's Sun Blade 6000 chassis is designed to support a wide range of application environments by integrating Oracle's x86 and SPARC server modules with high capacity networking and storage modules. This extremely eco-efficient and flexible blade enclosure provides a solid foundation for the most demanding workloads. Controlled by a single system management interface, the balanced architecture of the Sun Blade 6000 chassis provides an open, standards-based infrastructure for virtualized business applications, IT infrastructure, middleware, workload consolidation and databases.

PowerEdge C help you to maximize hyperscale performance with up to 4 independent server nodes, flexible storage and shared infrastructure in a compact 2U chassis.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Sun 6000
Learn more about PowerEdge C
Sample Customers
dcVASTNxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.