We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is easy to use. Requisition management and pre-screening are the two most valuable features."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The Talent Acquisition and Headhunting features are good."
"The solution offers good benefits for administrators."
"We use the cloud version to maintain all the employee records, payroll, etc. We use everything that comes with the HR suite."
"The best features that were working well for us was the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most valuable to our organization."
"It's brought to our organization a big big improvement. We would give it a good rating."
"The interface is really useful and it's very easy to combine different information. For example, we can easily get reports that we need. It's very easy to create reports."
"The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing."
"The interface is user-friendly. It is very simple and intuitive, so it's good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the performance management module."
"The performance of the solution is very good."
"The pricing could be improved."
"I don't see very valuable features in this product because it has an old way of interpreting ATS. It should be more flexible in managing datasets and data searches. The screening data is a long process in Taleo."
"The bulk recruitment feature does not work well."
"It's hard to share access with other people right now. If you try it will not work. They should do something that improves the ability to share everything."
"Analytics could use some work."
"They should improve the reports."
"We have many interruptions and disconnection points into processes, which is why we are looking to another solution. We are not so happy with the system. We believe we have in the market better solution, so we are looking for alternatives but so far the system has been used a lot."
"Some of the screens aren't that user-friendly, older employees especially have a hard time with it. They have some problems with it."
"LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems."
"There should be more connectivity with other systems."
"The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution."
"he user interface could be improved."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of modules that are being used, and the number of users."
"I don't want to comment on the license cost, to be honest. It could be about $1,000 approximately per customer. However, it's very flexible in terms of the licensing costs depending on the volume and depending on the deal of installation."
"If you go by best practices and do it right from the outset, the setup won't be a costly endeavor. In terms of setup, there is a lot of flexibility compared to three years ago."
"It could be cheaper."
Oracle Taleo is ranked 8th in Talent Management with 4 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 2nd in Talent Management with 21 reviews. Oracle Taleo is rated 7.8, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Taleo writes "Fair pricing, good cloud options, and helpful technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Highly flexible and gives full visibility into our workforce management processes". Oracle Taleo is most compared with Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft, Cornerstone Learning and SAP HCM, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and Cornerstone Learning. See our Oracle Taleo vs. SAP SuccessFactors report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.