Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs WaveMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
2,557 views|1,935 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
WaveMaker Logo
263 views|210 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and WaveMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."
  • "It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."
  • More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,557
    Comparisons
    1,935
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    263
    Comparisons
    210
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pramati
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

    WaveMaker is a visual application development platform to build web and mobile applications at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional application development.

    Sample Customers
    Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
    Vanenburg, Flanagan
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews while WaveMaker is ranked 31st in Rapid Application Development Software. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while WaveMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WaveMaker writes "This is a RAD tool to build business apps, tables, and forms". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS, whereas WaveMaker is most compared with Mendix and Microsoft Power Apps.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.