Compare Oracle VM vs. RHEV

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle VM Logo
15,749 views|12,016 comparisons
RHEV Logo
Read 12 RHEV reviews.
9,403 views|8,264 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The stability of the product is fine.""The support staff in the tech support team at Oracle has improved. I find them extremely helpful and they give very solid support.""It is simple and straightforward, and it will only require you one system integrator to do the job.""What I like best about this product is that it's free.""There's a lot of space to customize the solution if you need to.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is the resource management from the OVM Manager.""The solution is very stable. I don't recall any bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze.""The ability to live migrate VMs on the fly from one hypervisor to another has been very useful."

More Oracle VM Pros »

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the popularity of the OS.""The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good.""Red Hat is the most stable system.""Technically, the main reason why I'm using Red Hat is because of its stability.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the support portal.""Stability and speed are the most valuable aspects.""The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware.""The solution makes migration easy."

More RHEV Pros »

Cons
"There is no memory over-subscription and CPU over-subscription. That has to be improved in terms of Oracle VM perspective. The other leading virtualizing software solutions have this feature.""This solution is not as stable as other solutions in the market. But, Oracle has made an effort to improve these issues with recent updates.""The management can be improved more, and become more agile. It would be nice for it to become more rich in terms of UI. In addition, the replication to disaster recovery needs improvement.""Oracle VM should be more feature-rich.""The solution needs more features and flexibility in terms of communicating with other platforms. If it had that, it would be the perfect product.""You need to have a model for documentation available for the users. Right now, if you have to search for some troubleshooting, you need to have Oracle login. Many personnel might not have that login. The reach, the availability of information to the end-user, is not there.""If you do a gap analysis between VMware and Oracle VM, you can't do VM Snapshot. That's one thing you can't do. It's a sort of a snapshot, but it's not really Snapshot technology. It requires that you're running on CFS-2.""We do have a little trepidation with systemd, as it does have a learning curve."

More Oracle VM Cons »

"It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period.""The solution could use network virtualization.""The Administration of the Oracle database and the SAP ERP needs improvement.""I heard that there are big differences between Red Hat eight and seven, but it's still quite difficult for me to judge it. I found it a bit more difficult to manage than version seven, which was much easier. In term of features, though, it is still not yet clear which is better. I have no clear idea of which features need to be changed at the moment.""Configuring the network interfaces is much better in Ubuntu and should be improved.""It lags behind in that you need to go to something like Fedora to get all the extra bells and whistles.""In comparison to VMware, this solution isn't as stable. We're testing it right now, and we're not trusting the stability of the product.""The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them."

More RHEV Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of this solution is cheap. It is one of the reasons we chose Oracle VM. It is truly "pocket- friendly."""Pricing and licensing is one of the main decision making reasons for going to Oracle VM because it was cost effective.""Oracle VM is free if you are running it on Oracle infrastructure hardware, otherwise, it is subscription-based.""Licensing costs are less for Oracle Linux and for clients moving to the Oracle Cloud, as it is included in the price of the subscription.""I recommend this for any customer wanting to reduce their licensing costs for packaged applications.""If you choose Oracle hardware, then this virtualization software is included along with support.""We were able to deploy our solution at near zero cost compared to other vendors since the licenses come with our Oracle hardware.""With having a global contract, we get some discounts."

More Oracle VM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an open-source solution.""I would say the price is acceptable.""We are using the free version of Red Hat.""I believe we pay on a yearly basis."

More RHEV Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: VMware is more popular. OVM or better OLVM is good for Oracle products because provides "hard paritioning".
Top Answer: What they provide is way beyond the essential requirements of customers.
Top Answer: Red Hat is easily three to five times cheaper than the nearest competitor. Our business model is slightly different. If you look at Gerome HCI, for example, the core product that we sell, it is not… more »
Top Answer: To be honest, I can't think of anything that needs improving, they work faster than I do and produce things so quickly and swiftly that I can't catch up with them. Before I can think of something new… more »
Ranking
Views
15,749
Comparisons
12,016
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
495
Rating
7.3
Views
9,403
Comparisons
8,264
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
461
Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
Learn
Oracle
Red Hat
Overview

Oracle VM for x86

Oracle VM for x86 is a Xen based server virtualization platform for public and private cloud and traditional on premise deployment. Oracle VM offers full lifecycle and application deployment from disk to cloud.

Designed and optimized for security, efficiency and performance Oracle VM supports major hardware vendors x86 and storage platforms and can run workloads on Linux, Windows and Oracle Solaris. Uniquely for our virtualization platform it offers live patching via Ksplice enhancing security and minimizing service disruption. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Oracle VM for SPARC

Oracle VM for SPARC is a firmware based virtualization platform for Oracle and Fujitsu SPARC based servers running Solaris. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.


Offer
Learn more about Oracle VM
Learn more about RHEV
Sample Customers
Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace, Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company9%
Local Government9%
Consumer Goods Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm4%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider30%
Integrator20%
Manufacturing Company20%
Government10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider27%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise57%
REVIEWERS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise35%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle VM is ranked 8th in Server Virtualization Software with 11 reviews while RHEV is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 12 reviews. Oracle VM is rated 7.2, while RHEV is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "Low cost robust VM soln with ability to patch with no downtime and free Live migration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RHEV writes "The versatility and compatability of this virtualization solution are marred by the lack of availability of local support". Oracle VM is most compared with KVM, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, Proxmox VE and Nutanix Acropolis AOS, whereas RHEV is most compared with KVM, Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V and Citrix Hypervisor. See our Oracle VM vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.