Oracle WebCenter vs Wordpress.com VIP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price needs to be lowered."
  • "The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."
  • "WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    770
    Comparisons
    614
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    189
    Rating
    7.0
    24th
    Views
    150
    Comparisons
    110
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebCenter, FatWire
    Learn More
    Wordpress
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

    Wordpress.com VIP is the world's most elegant publishing platform and also its most loved. More sites are powered by WordPress than any other Content Management System (CMS) combined.
    Sample Customers
    Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
    Gigaom, Re/code, Grantland, National Post, TIME.com, National Post, LIN Media, NFL Blogs, Tim Ferriss, NextDraft, Metro UK, USA Today, Foreign Policy, NBC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Pharma/Biotech Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    University9%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available

    Oracle WebCenter is ranked 7th in Web Content Management with 12 reviews while Wordpress.com VIP is ranked 24th in Web Content Management. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while Wordpress.com VIP is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wordpress.com VIP writes "I wish Wordpress had come out a long time ago". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas Wordpress.com VIP is most compared with .

    See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.