Compare Oracle WebCenter vs. XperienCentral

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle WebCenter Logo
2,625 views|2,106 comparisons
XperienCentral Logo
30 views|13 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."

More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
Views
2,625
Comparisons
2,106
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
8.8
36th
Views
30
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebCenter, FatWire
Learn More
GX Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

The central go-to place where you manage every ‘experience’– that’s XperienCentral. With this powerful content management system (CMS) you personalize your digital channels and make them relevant and consistent. The system is rich in functionalities that make it simple to generate new and personalized content and publish it across different websites and channels.

Our CMS also guarantees that your websites are reliable and accessible and with its open architecture you can easily integrate existing content or other data already in the CSM. All this to help you to continuously create relevant content and engage in personalized dialogue with your customer.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle WebCenter
Learn more about XperienCentral
Sample Customers
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
ING Group, AFC Ajax, KPN, WWF, Nationale Postcode Loterij, Voetbal International
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Pharma/Biotech Company25%
Healthcare Company13%
Marketing Services Firm13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle WebCenter is ranked 3rd in Web Content Management with 5 reviews while XperienCentral is ranked 36th in Web Content Management. Oracle WebCenter is rated 8.8, while XperienCentral is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". On the other hand, Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, SharePoint, WebLogic Suite, IBM FileNet and Adobe Experience Manager, whereas XperienCentral is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.